Symantec, the American computer security and backup solutions software corporation, the company behind the famous Norton AntiVirus, has finally given a nod to what critics have been saying for years – virus scanning is “dead” and “doomed to failure”.

Amidst reports of failing revenues in the past two quarters, and prospects of something similar in this one, Symantec’s Senior Vice-President for Information Security, Brian Dye, told the Wall Street Journal that it was galling to watch other security companies surge ahead. As reported by the WSJ,

Mr. Dye, who has spent more than a decade with Symantec, says it was galling to watch other security companies surge ahead. “It’s one thing to sit there and get frustrated,” he says. “It’s another thing to act on it, go get your act together and go play the game you should have been playing in the first place.

Symantec pioneered computer security with its antivirus software in the late 1980s. The technology keeps hackers out by checking against a list of malicious code spotted on computers. Think of it as an immune system for machines.

But hackers increasingly use novel bugs. Mr. Dye estimates antivirus now catches just 45% of cyberattacks.

That puts Symantec in a pickle. Antivirus and other products that run on individual devices still account for more than 40% of the company’s revenue. Specialized cybersecurity services for businesses account for less than one-fifth of revenue and generate smaller profit margins. It would be impractical, if not impossible, to sell such services to individual consumers.

Several media houses have since then written long obituaries for the once infallible antivirus programs. What they fail to realize is that this statement from Symantec is not a rejection of anti-virus technology. It is merely an acknowledgment that antivirus software is not sufficient for security anymore.

A Symantec representative told eWEEK,

Modern anti-malware software is no longer just “antivirus” but software that relies on a several defensive layers, including behavioral and intrusion-detection measures, to protect the endpoint. Antivirus is great for known threats, but you really need those proactive technologies. You need both proactive and reactive together.Piero DePaoli, Senior Director of Product Marketing

“The era of the standalone antivirus” maybe behind us, but antivirus as a component of endpoint security however, “continues to have a role in the enterprise and in protecting consumers”. As such, Symantec has no plans to abandon their popular Norton AntiVirus and Norton Internet Security range of products, but will look to find revenue growth in its new product lines.

The company will continue to sell traditional antivirus as a first line of defense, but these will be supplemented by novel, new services that keep pace with the increasing complexity of malware threats and other cyber-attacks.

Which anti-virus software do you use? Which one do you recommend? Share your opinions with us, lets have a fruitful discussion!

Source: The Wall Street Journal

About the author


I'm the guy who makes the site look good with my amazing looks. I'm a very curious individual and I'm always looking to learn new things when it comes to anything and everything tech related. I might look like a bot, but always remember, looks can be and probably are deceiving. Posts by this user/account are not their original work. They are work from past authors who are no longer with the site or possibly even guest posts or sponsored posts.


  • Very true! With so many malwares being detected every single day it was about time for something like this to happen. I remember the times when antivirus definitions were merely a 40 MB download but now their size have increased ten folds. No doubt these definitions are good for signature based detection but in modern times we need something highly on the proactive side while maintaining an acceptable false positive rate and minimum user intervention/interaction. Companies like Bromium shows a promising future by deploying newer technologies like solitary confinement micro VM but as of now they are only offering endpoint protection.

  • BTW I’m using Malwarebytes Anti-Malware along with Comodo Personal Firewall.

  • Ive used Malwarebytes once, didn’t take much liking to it. Somehow I keep coming back to Avast for all my security needs.

    Then there iObit Advanced System Care too… But it seems to slow down the system after 4-5 months of usage.

    • I have used avast in the past and I still love it. It has a small memory footprint and doesn’t slow down your system. I’ll be installing it again probably. I have been using Malwarebytes for the past 2 years along with Comodo Personal Firewall and haven’t face a single infection yet. I rely strongly upon AVComparatives’ report before selecting my Anti-virus

      • Very true about avast’s memory footprint..exactly why I prefer it. I would also recommend Microsoft Security Essentials for that matter. Very much like avast.

  • I’m extгemely impresseɗ ѡith your writing аbilities
    and also with the format to your blog. Is thiѕ a pаid subject matter or did you moԁify it your
    self? Еither way stay սp the nice quɑlity ԝriting, it’s uncommon to look a great blog lіke this oոe these

  • I don’t use an antivirus on Ubuntu, except ClamTK for scanning for Windows viruses that I don’t want to share, but I seldom use it because the auto-scan doesn’t work. I used ESET NOD32 on Windows though. It did what it had to do.